Showing posts with label 2001.03(80). Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2001.03(80). Show all posts

Wednesday, July 10, 2024

The Future of the Soil Remediation Act of 2001 2001 03 80

Cases of soil environmental contamination due to redevelopment of former factory and research institute sites are becoming apparent.


Cases of soil contamination due to redevelopment of former factory and research institute sites are becoming more and more apparent. According to the results of a survey conducted by the Environment Agency, of the 659 cases of soil pollution (accumulated since FY1991) identified by prefectures by the end of FY1998, 292 cases were found not to be in compliance with soil environmental standards, of which 111 cases were identified in FY1998 alone.


However, the only legal systems currently in place in Japan for soil environmental preservation are the Law Concerning Prevention of Soil Contamination on Agricultural Land, the Law Concerning Special Measures against Dioxins (measures related to contaminated soil), and the Water Pollution Control Law (regulations on groundwater infiltration and orders for cleanup measures). The Law Concerning Prevention of Soil Contamination in Agricultural Land covers cadmium, copper, and arsenic, and the Law Concerning Special Measures against Dioxins covers cadmium, copper, and arsenic in agricultural land. The Law Concerning Special Measures against Dioxins obliges prefectures and other entities to implement measures to treat dioxins on all land and to bear the costs for those who cause pollution. The Water Pollution Prevention Law allows prefectural governors to order the implementation of treatment measures for cadmium and 23 other substances on all land to those who cause pollution.


However, each of these laws is weak as a system in terms of target areas, target substances, and cleanup obligations. In particular, some local governments have established ordinances for urban areas, but with the exception of dioxins, there is no obligation to clean up.


The "Study Group on the System of Soil Environmental Conservation Measures" (in charge: Soil Environment Division, Water Environment Department, Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of the Environment) has been studying the soil contamination countermeasure system for urban areas since the end of 2000, including how the cost should be borne. The four main issues to be discussed are: 1) how to identify contaminated sites and investigate soil contamination, 2) how to assess the environmental risk of soil contamination, 3) how to deal with treatment measures, and 4) how to manage information.


For item 1., since most of the contaminated soil in urban areas is privately owned land, a system necessary for identifying and investigating soil contamination will be studied; for item 2., in addition to the current environmental standards, new guideline values (e.g., criteria for initiating countermeasures and purification standards) will be set based on environmental (health) risks; and for item 3., based on the study of item 2., a system for identifying and investigating contaminated land will be developed. 3. will examine how to organize countermeasure technologies and systems according to contaminants and the actual state of contamination, based on the studies described in 2. In section 4, a registration system for information on contaminated sites, such as the National Priorities List (NPL) for rice, will be an important issue.

For now, the goal is to submit a "Law on Urban Soil Contamination Countermeasures" (tentative name) to the Diet in 2002. However, the schedule for the study and the prospects for its enactment into law are currently blank, as there are many difficult issues to consider. The content of the law is expected to be based on the PPP principle (Polluter Pays Principle), modeled after the U.S. Superfund Law and other laws, and will be tailored to domestic conditions. However, the specifics such as the scope of polluters (retroactivity), whether public funds will be used, and the retroactivity of pollution prior to the enforcement of the law will depend on further discussions.


If the law imposes a cleanup obligation, it is expected that public funds for treatment measures will be established at the time the law comes into effect from a practical standpoint. It is also expected that related laws such as the "Waste Disposal and Public Cleansing Law" (proper management of final disposal sites after landfill disposal) and the "Law Concerning Special Measures against Mining Pollution from Metal Mining and Other Industries" will also be considered for revision.


At present, the study group is in the process of discussing environmental standards and how risks are perceived, and holding hearings with relevant parties. Requests made to the government at the hearings include support for countermeasure costs, including preferential tax treatment, support and guidance for the development of investigation and remediation technologies, and a mechanism for an incentive-based information disclosure system.


Soil contamination investigations are expected to become common regardless of the legal system through real estate transactions, securitization, and the issuance of site assessment standards, but the establishment of a legal system, including a support system, is key to the actual cleanup process. Whether the purification business, which is said to have a potential market of 13 trillion yen, will flourish at once will depend largely on how the system is organized.


An interim report from the study group is expected to be compiled by summer.

2001年の土壌浄化法の行方 2001 03 80

 「工場跡地や研究機関跡地の再開発による土壌環境汚染事例の顕在化」


工場跡地や研究機関跡地の再開発などにより、土壌環境汚染事例が顕在化してきている。環境庁の調査結果では、98年度末までに都道府県が把握した土壌汚染の調査事例659件(91年度からの累積)のうち、土壌環境基準に適合していないことが判明した事例は292件にのぼっており、このうち98年度に判明した事例だけで111件となっている。


しかしながら現在、国内における土壌環境保全対策の法制度は「農用地の土壌の汚染防止等に関する法律」「ダイオキシン類対策特別措置法(汚染された土壌に係わる措置)」「水質汚濁防止法(地下水浸透規制・浄化措置命令)」が整備されているのみ。「農用地の土壌の汚染防止等に関する法律」は農用地を対象にカドミウム、銅、ヒ素。「ダイオキシン類対策特別措置法」はすべての土地を対象にダイオキシン類の都道府県等による処理対策の実施と汚染原因者への費用負担を義務付けるもの。「水質汚濁防止法」は、すべての土地を対象にカドミウム等23物質について、都道府県知事による汚染原因者への処理対策の実施命令が行なえるというもの。


だがそれぞれでは、対象地、対象物質、浄化義務など制度としては弱い面がある。特に市街地については、一部の地方自治体で条例を定めているところもあるが、ダイオキシン類を除き浄化義務は無いに等しい。


そこでいよいよ、「土壌環境保全対策の制度の在り方に関する検討会」(担当:環境省環境管理局水環境部土壌環境課)が2000年末から、費用負担のあり方も含め市街地の土壌汚染対策制度について検討を開始している。主な検討課題は、1. 汚染地の把握と土壌汚染の調査のあり方、2. 土壌汚染の環境リスクの捉え方、3. 処理対策のあり方、4. 情報管理のあり方、の4項目。


については、市街地における土壌汚染の大半が民有地であることから、その把握や調査の実施に必要な仕組みについて検討を進める。2. は現行の環境基準とは別に、環境(健康)リスクを踏まえた新たな指針値(対策発動基準、浄化基準など)の設定などが検討される予定。3. は2. の検討に基づき、汚染物質や汚染実態に応じた対策技術の整理、あるいは対策制度のあり方を検討する。費用負担のあり方などが焦点となりそうだ。4. では、米の全国優先順位一覧(NPL)のような汚染地情報の登録制度が重要課題となる。

とりあえず、2002年の「市街地土壌汚染対策法」(仮称)国会提出を目標としている。とはいえ検討スケジュールや法制化の見通しに関しては、検討事項に難しいものが多いため今のところ白紙状態。法の内容については、米・スーパー ファンド法などをモデルに、PPP原則 (Polluter Pays Principle:汚染者支払原則)を前提として国内事情に適したものになると予想されるが、汚染者の範囲(遡及性)や公的資金を投入するのか、法施行以前の汚染に対する遡及性など具体的な内容はこれからの検討次第。


浄化義務を課すのであれば、法施行当初は現実的にみて処理対策のための公的財源が設けられるものと思われる。また、「廃棄物の処理及び清掃に関する法律」(埋立処分終了後の最終処分場の適正管理)や「金属鉱業等鉱害対策特別措置法」など関連法の改正も視野に入ってくると予想される。


現在のところ検討会では、環境基準やリスクの捉え方に関する議論と、関係者からのヒアリングを行なっている段階。ヒアリングでの国への要望としては、対策費用の税制優遇を含む支援、調査・浄化技術の開発支援・指導、インセンティブのある情報公開制度の仕組みなどが挙がっている。


土壌汚染の調査については、不動産売買、証券化、サイトアセスメント規格の発行などで法制度に関わらず一般化していくものと思われるが、実際の浄化が行われるかは支援制度も含めた法制度の確立が重要なカギを握る。潜在市場13兆円ともいわれる浄化ビジネスが一気に花開くか、制度の在り方次第で大きく左右されそうだ。


夏頃をメドに検討会の中間報告がまとめられる予定。