Return or Burn: The Shaky Future of Plastics - August 1994
In 1994, amidst the growing interest in environmental issues, "biodegradable plastics" were in the spotlight. The material, which is degraded by microorganisms in nature and returns to water and carbon dioxide, was expected to be a way to reduce waste. In reality, however, technical, economic, and social obstacles stood in the way.
Manufacturers, distributors, and academics engaged in heated discussions at a committee set up by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) to study the practical application of the material. One chemical company representative asked, "With incineration facilities in place, is it necessary to dare to promote the use of degradable materials? This was the viewpoint of a company that values rationality.
On the other hand, a distributor argued, "Consumers are moved by the words 'return to nature. Environmental friendliness was no longer a function, but rather a "story" that was beginning to have market value.
The scholar delved deeper. The researchers delved deeper: "Are the decomposition products really harmless? Without verifying the effects on soil and water quality, it cannot be said to be "good for the environment. This is a warning bell for those who believe that ideals are only as good as the science that backs them up.
At the time, "Biopol," "Bionolle," and "Matarpy," which were the focus of much attention, were expensive, and their use was limited. Nevertheless, the vision of the future encompassed by these materials was not just a product, but symbolized a shift in values.
To return or to burn? The choice continues to this day.
No comments:
Post a Comment